This article initially appeared in The Texas Tribune.
A Uvalde County grand jury has indicted former college district police Chief Pete Arredondo and one other former district officer on prices of kid endangerment, the primary legal prices introduced in opposition to regulation enforcement for the botched response to the deadliest college taking pictures in Texas historical past, the San Antonio Categorical-Information first reported.
Arredondo and Adrian Gonzales face felony prices of abandoning or endangering a toddler, the newspaper reported.
The costs come greater than two years after the Could 24, 2022 taking pictures, during which a lone gunman killed 19 fourth graders and two lecturers.
Uvalde County District Legal professional Christina Mitchell convened a grand jury in January to research regulation enforcement’s delayed response and to find out whether or not to convey legal prices in opposition to any of the practically 400 federal, state and native officers concerned within the response.
Regulation enforcement officers waited 77 minutes to confront the gunman, who was in the end shot and killed by Border Patrol officers.
![School shootings: White crossed with names in black paint and flowers on them in grassy area](https://youthtoday.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2022/10/AP22272676768305-771x514.jpg)
Jae C. Hong/AP File
Crosses with the names of taking pictures victims are positioned exterior Robb Elementary College in Uvalde, Texas, Could 26, 2022.
The botched regulation enforcement response has been extensively criticized, together with in a January U.S. Justice Division report. That report documented failures in management, and U.S. Legal professional Normal Merrick Garland famous that lives may have been saved had regulation enforcement acted sooner.
Within the months following the taking pictures, a few dozen officers have been fired, suspended or retired. Arredondo was fired about three months after the taking pictures. He was listed as incident commander on the varsity district’s lively shooter response plan.
On Thursday, the district legal professional briefed some households of victims in regards to the indictment, mentioned Jesse Rizo, whose niece Jacklyn Cazares was among the many kids killed within the taking pictures. Rizo mentioned he was hopeful that the indicted officers could be prosecuted.
“I’m actually hoping that is only the start of indictments that could be coming down,” Rizo mentioned.
“There are numerous officers that should be held accountable.”
Lalo Castillo, an area activist who mentioned he realized of the indictments about an hour after they occurred, mentioned he had anticipated state officers to face legal prices, too.
“Particularly the state troopers as a result of they have been the primary ones there,” Castillo mentioned, referring to officers from the Texas Division of Public Security
The DA’s workplace didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark. Efforts to achieve Arredondo and Gonzales have been unsuccessful.
![Uvalde families plead for languishing Texas gun bills: group of people in black shirts stand next to someone speaking at podium](https://youthtoday.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2023/04/Uvalde-families-plead-for-languishing-Texas-gun-bills-771x513.jpg)
Eric Homosexual/AP
Felicia Martinez, mom of Xavier Lopez who was killed by a gunman at Robb Elementary College in Uvalde, Texas, middle tries to carry again tears as she and different surviving relations attend a information convention on the Texas Capitol with Texas State Sen. Roland Gutierrez, in Austin, Texas, on Jan. 24, 2023.
It’s not clear whether or not some other officers will face legal prices. Grand jury proceedings in Texas are secret, so witness testimony isn’t open to the general public. Twelve grand jurors have been listening to proof offered by the district legal professional’s workplace.
DPS Director Steve McCraw is amongst those that have testified earlier than the grand jury. McCraw beforehand blamed native officers for the bungled response. In 2022, he testified earlier than the Texas Senate and mentioned it wasn’t possible for his officers to imagine command, although Arredondo was not appearing rapidly. In whole, 91 of the responding officers have been from DPS.
[Related: Active shooter training — State-specific requirements for schools and law enforcement]
Cops have authorized protections that make it troublesome to efficiently convey legal prices in opposition to them. The U.S. Supreme Court docket has held that officers don’t have a constitutional “responsibility to guard,” even when they’re educated to take action. Authorized consultants have said prosecutors might have a troublesome burden of proving past an affordable doubt that officers have been below a authorized responsibility to behave and in failing to take action, triggered hurt.
The grand jury investigation is considered one of at least six official probes launched after the taking pictures. These investigations have largely left relations of the victims annoyed.
Households, together with neighborhood activists, have continued to push for elevated transparency and accountability.
Most lately, town of Uvalde launched an impartial evaluation that cleared all local officers of wrongdoing, irritating dad and mom of the youngsters killed within the bloodbath and at the least some native authorities officers.
Personal investigator Jesse Prado, who performed that evaluation, recognized lapses in management but in addition recommended some officers and mentioned they acted in “good religion.” Prado additionally blamed the district legal professional for not cooperating along with his investigation. Mitchell is in possession of a state police report however has but to make that report public.
Days after Prado’s evaluation turned public, Uvalde Police Chief Daniel Rodriguez, who was on trip when the varsity taking pictures occurred, announced his resignation. On the day of the taking pictures, Rodriguez spoke with appearing chief Lt. Mariano Pargas and requested him to arrange a command put up, in response to the city-commissioned evaluation. Pargas didn’t arrange a put up. He stepped down from the Uvalde Police Division in November 2022.
Rizo, whose niece died within the taking pictures, mentioned he’s hopeful that Pargas additionally faces legal prices.
“He’s simply as responsible as Arredondo,” Rizo mentioned.
Within the absence of concrete motion by elected officers, some households have filed civil lawsuits.
Family members of 17 of the youngsters killed and two who have been injured sued DPS in Could, the day earlier than the second anniversary of the taking pictures. The households additionally reached a $2 million settlement with town of Uvalde, and town dedicated to offering enhanced coaching for present and future regulation enforcement officers.
[Related: Uvalde mom sues police, gunmaker in school massacre]
Family members additionally filed a separate lawsuit in opposition to Daniel Protection, the corporate that manufactured the shooter’s gun, in addition to California-based firms Meta and Activision.
***
Pooja Salhotra is an Austin-based Texas Tribune reporter protecting points starting from breaking information to developments in state businesses.
This article initially appeared in The Texas Tribune.
The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonprofit, nonpartisan media newsroom group that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public coverage, politics, authorities and statewide points.
![](https://youthtoday.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2017/12/YouthTodayLogoHorizWebsiteEdit02D.png)