Visions of America/Joseph Sohm/Common Photographs Group by way of Getty Photographs
Connecticut lawmakers is not going to transfer forward with a proposed ban on legacy admissions preferences that superior from committee in March. As an alternative, the state Senate passed a bill that will require faculties to report information on legacy admissions to the legislature. The Home will vote on that measure within the subsequent week.
The invoice’s modification follows a months-long struggle between lawmakers and personal faculties that oppose state intervention, together with Yale and Fairfield Universities, the place latest courses have been made up of practically 15 % legacy admits.
Connecticut would have been the second state to ban preferences for kin of alumni at each private and non-private establishments; Maryland grew to become the primary last week, although its most selective non-public establishment, Johns Hopkins College, ended the practice in 2020. Two different states, Colorado and Virginia, ban legacy preferences at public however not non-public establishments.
The invoice was considered one of many legislative attacks on alumni preferences to emerge after final June’s Supreme Courtroom ruling banning affirmative motion, which unleashed a wave of public sentiment in opposition to the apply.
Connecticut state senator Derek Slap, who co-sponsored the legacy ban invoice, instructed Inside Increased Ed in March that though he was hopeful that the time had come for such a regulation, he knew there was a risk it could be negotiated all the way down to a transparency measure, even after it handed the training committee 18 to 4.
It’s a destiny acquainted to legacy abolitionists throughout the nation. After the Varsity Blues scandal triggered an outcry in faculty admissions in 2019, a California invoice to ban legacy preferences appeared to have unstoppable momentum. However after the invoice languished in committee for a 12 months, state lawmakers reworked it right into a transparency bill as a substitute, which they handed in 2020.
Payments to ban legacy at private and non-private faculties are nonetheless up for consideration in lots of different states, together with New York and Massachusetts.
Visions of America/Joseph Sohm/Common Photographs Group by way of Getty Photographs
Connecticut lawmakers is not going to transfer forward with a proposed ban on legacy admissions preferences that superior from committee in March. As an alternative, the state Senate passed a bill that will require faculties to report information on legacy admissions to the legislature. The Home will vote on that measure within the subsequent week.
The invoice’s modification follows a months-long struggle between lawmakers and personal faculties that oppose state intervention, together with Yale and Fairfield Universities, the place latest courses have been made up of practically 15 % legacy admits.
Connecticut would have been the second state to ban preferences for kin of alumni at each private and non-private establishments; Maryland grew to become the primary last week, although its most selective non-public establishment, Johns Hopkins College, ended the practice in 2020. Two different states, Colorado and Virginia, ban legacy preferences at public however not non-public establishments.
The invoice was considered one of many legislative attacks on alumni preferences to emerge after final June’s Supreme Courtroom ruling banning affirmative motion, which unleashed a wave of public sentiment in opposition to the apply.
Connecticut state senator Derek Slap, who co-sponsored the legacy ban invoice, instructed Inside Increased Ed in March that though he was hopeful that the time had come for such a regulation, he knew there was a risk it could be negotiated all the way down to a transparency measure, even after it handed the training committee 18 to 4.
It’s a destiny acquainted to legacy abolitionists throughout the nation. After the Varsity Blues scandal triggered an outcry in faculty admissions in 2019, a California invoice to ban legacy preferences appeared to have unstoppable momentum. However after the invoice languished in committee for a 12 months, state lawmakers reworked it right into a transparency bill as a substitute, which they handed in 2020.
Payments to ban legacy at private and non-private faculties are nonetheless up for consideration in lots of different states, together with New York and Massachusetts.